Skin analysis

A read on your skin, from one photo

Skin type, the concerns that are actually visible, and how pronounced each one is. No quiz, no account, and nothing to buy at the end of it.

Free, no sign-up. Not a medical diagnosis.

A woman photographing her own face on a phone in daylight by a window

What it reads

Skin type

Dry, oily, combination or balanced — read from the photo rather than from a questionnaire about how your face feels.

Visible concerns

Texture, pigmentation, redness, visible pores and fine lines, each with how pronounced it actually looks.

Nothing to buy

No products, no routine, no upsell. It describes what it sees and stops there.

Questions people actually ask

How do I find out my skin type?
Skin type is mostly about how your skin behaves through the day — whether it tightens, shines, or does both in different places. A photo can show the visible half of that: shine across the T-zone, flaking, visible pores and texture. It is a good starting read, and worth checking against how your skin actually feels a few hours after washing.
Is this a medical diagnosis?
No, and it will not pretend otherwise. It describes what is visible in a photograph. It cannot diagnose a condition, and anything that is changing, painful, bleeding or worrying you belongs with a dermatologist rather than a camera.
Is it free?
Yes, and there is nothing at the end of it. This page runs the analysis and shows you the result. There are no product recommendations, because the read is the point.
What makes a good photo?
Daylight, no filter, no makeup, and your whole face square to the camera. Harsh overhead light exaggerates texture and warm indoor bulbs shift the colour, so a window beats a lamp. If the photo is not good enough to read, it will ask for another rather than guess.
What happens to my photo?
It is used to produce the reading and is not needed afterwards. No account, no sign-up.

Selling skincare?

Suprlativeputs this on your own storefront, reading the shopper’s skin against your catalogue and your claims — so the read ends in the right product instead of a dead end.